Appeal No. 2005-0440 Application No. 09/994,075 line 66 to column 2, line 4.) While Eckert’s disclosure focuses on “a peroxide-based delignifying and bleaching solution” at a pH between about 1 and about 7 (column 1, lines 16-19; column 3, lines 56-58), the reference teaches that the bleaching agent is added to a slurry of the pulp. Evans discloses a method of deinking recycled fibers by disintegrating waste paper in an alkaline aqueous solution containing sodium sulfite and sodium carbonate to produce a fibrous slurry having a pH of at least about 7.5, separating the ink from the fibers, and removing the ink from the slurry. (Column 1, lines 47-52.) According to Evans, the disclosed process “advantageously provides the alkalinity needed to separate the ink without embrittling or darkening the fibers.” (Column 1, lines 52-54.) Evans further states that the addition of a combination of the sodium sulfite and sodium carbonate into the pulp slurry eliminates or greatly reduces the need for “additional bleaching.” (Column 2, lines 47-50; column 3, lines 34-51.) We agree with the examiner that the teachings of WO ’308 and Eckert or Evans, taken together, would have led one of ordinary skill in the art to add sodium sulfite or a combination of sodium sulfite and sodium carbonate into the pulp slurry of 6Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007