Appeal No. 2005-0486 Application No. 09/887,836 substrate. The examiner does not point to any teaching in either Omura or Satoh that suggests this claimed recitation. In view of the above, we therefore also reverse the 35 U.S.C. § 103 of claim 11 as being obvious over Omura in view of Satoh. III. Conclusion Each of the rejections is reversed. REVERSED EDWARD C. KIMLIN ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) BOARD PATENT CHARLES F. WARREN ) APPEALS Administrative Patent Judge ) AND )INTERFERENCES ) ) ) BEVERLY A. PAWLIKOWSKI ) Administrative Patent Judge ) BAP:psb 6Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007