Ex Parte Mintgen et al - Page 1



                    The opinion in support of the decision being                      
                    entered today was not written for publication                     
          and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                  

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    ____________                                      
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                              AND INTERFERENCES                                       
                                   ____________                                       
                    Ex parte ROLF MINTGEN and CASTOR FUHRMANN                         
                                   ____________                                       
                              Appeal No. 2005-0487                                    
                         Application No. 09/961,821                                   
                                   ____________                                       
                                   ON BRIEF                                           
                                   ____________                                       
          Before FRANKFORT, MCQUADE and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.           
          MCQUADE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                       
                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               Rolf Mintgen et al. appeal from the final rejection of                 
          claims 1 and 3 through 10, all of the claims pending in the                 
          application.1                                                               
                                   THE INVENTION                                      
               The invention relates to “a piston-cylinder assembly with a            
          braking device” (specification, page 2).  Representative claim 1            
          reads as follows:                                                           


               1 Claim 5 has been amended subsequent to final rejection.              




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007