Ex Parte Mintgen et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2005-0487                                                        
          Application No. 09/961,821                                                  
               1.  A piston-cylinder assembly comprising                              
               a cylinder containing a blocking medium,                               
               a piston rod which is axially movable in said cylinder, and            
               a piston affixed to said piston rod and dividing said                  
          cylinder into two working spaces, said piston comprising at least           
          one flow-through opening connecting said working spaces, a ring             
          groove bounded by axially opposed side walls, and an elastically            
          deformable valve ring seated in said ring groove with axial play,           
          said valve ring frictionally engaging said cylinder, said at                
          least one flow-through opening comprising at least one pocket               
          formed in at least one of said side walls, said at least one                
          pocket being completely open when said piston rod is at rest with           
          respect to said cylinder, said valve ring moving toward one of              
          said side walls as a function of the direction of movement of               
          said piston rod, said valve ring deforming into said at least one           
          pocket to at least partially seal off said at least one pocket              
          when the piston rod exceeds a predetermined speed relative to the           
          cylinder, so that flow of said blocking medium between said                 
          working spaces is impeded and said speed is limited.                        
                                                                                     
                                   THE PRIOR ART                                      
               The references relied on by the examiner to support the                
          rejections on appeal are:                                                   
          Freitag et al.            4,595,182            Jun. 17, 1986                
          (Freitag)                                                                   
          Ludwig                    4,635,908            Jan. 13, 1987                
                                   THE REJECTIONS                                     
               Claims 1, 3 and 6 through 8 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.             
          § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Ludwig.                                 


                                          2                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007