The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and
is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte THOMAS HUTTNER, HELMUT WURZER,
and REINHARD MAHNKOPF
____________
Appeal No. 2005-0518
Application No. 09/313,424
____________
HEARD: March 9, 2005
____________
Before OWENS, KRATZ, and TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.
TIMM, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Claims 1-6 and 16-25 are pending in the Application. Claims 1-6 have been withdrawn
from consideration. Claims 7-15 have been cancelled. Claim 22 has been deemed allowable if
written in independent form. Claims 16-21 and 23-25 stand rejected and are subject to this
appeal (Brief, p. 2). We have jurisdiction over the appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007