Appeal No. 2005-0523 Page 4 Application No. 10/264,733 is associated with a client without a need of recompilation. Appellant argues that instead of teaching replacement of one object with another object, Miloushev teaches allowing objects to invoke directly the services of other objects. Thus, appellant argues that at least two objects in Miloushev must interact with one another as opposed to one object simply taking the place of another object as claimed. Appellant also argues that in Miloushev there is never any insertion of one object for another object when the two identifiers of the associated objects are different. Finally, appellant argues that any suggestion of inherency in Miloushev is not supported by the evidence [brief, pages 6-9]. The examiner responds that ActiveX controls use dynamic link libraries (DLLs) and that DLLs do not require recompiling. The examiner asserts that static links in Miloushev are recompiled, but dynamic links are not recompiled. The thrust of the examiner’s position is that the replacement of one object by another as claimed is the essence of dynamic linking [answer, pages 4-6]. Appellant responds that in Miloushev two objects must interact rather than one object replacing another as claimed. Appellant also responds that there is no connection between having to compile or recompile and the DLL feature of ActiveX controls. Appellant also asserts that the examiner has pointedPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007