Appeal No. 2005-0523 Page 6
Application No. 10/264,733
examiner’s rejection of claim 14 because the examiner has failed
to establish a prima facie case of obviousness. The rejection is
based on the deficiencies in Miloushev discussed above.
In summary, we have not sustained either of the
examiner’s rejections of the claims on appeal. Therefore, the
decision of the examiner rejecting claims 1-5 and 12-17 is
reversed.
REVERSED
)
Jerry Smith )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
Joseph L. Dixon )
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
)
) INTERFERENCES
)
Anita Pellman Gross )
Administrative Patent Judge )
JS/eld
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007