The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte CARLOS PEDRIDO and BERNARD LEUENBERGER ____________ Appeal No. 2005-0584 Application No. 09/745,414 ____________ HEARD: March 09, 2005 ____________ Before OWENS, KRATZ and TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges. KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claim 10. Claims 1-9 and 11-15, which are all of the other claims pending in this application, have been indicated as being allowable by the examiner. BACKGROUND Appellants' invention relates to an inlet arrangement for inserting a preform into a fiber drawing furnace. An understanding of the invention can be derived from a reading of appealed claim 10, which is reproduced below.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007