Ex Parte Pedrido et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2005-0584                                                        
          Application No. 09/745,414                                 Page 2           

                    10. An inlet arrangement for inserting a preform                  
               into a furnace for drawing fiber, comprising:                          
                    an inlet;                                                         
                    an outlet downstream of the inlet,                                
                    a first conveying path through the inlet                          
               arrangement extending from the inlet to the outlet, the                
               first conveying path for conveying the perform body                    
               from and through the inlet to and through the outlet;                  
                    a first seal;                                                     
                    a closure member located downstream of the inlet                  
               and between the first seal and the outlet, the closure                 
               member selectively moveable between a closed position                  
               that closes and seals the first conveying path and an                  
               opened position that opens and unseals the first                       
               conveying path; and                                                    
                    an injector located downstream of the closure                     
               member and between the closure member and the outlet,                  
               the injector for injecting a gas into the first                        
               conveying path of the inlet arrangement.                               
               The sole prior art reference of record relied upon by the              
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims is:                               
          Nicholson et al. (Nicholson)       5,713,979      Feb. 03, 1998             
               Claim 10 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being             
          anticipated by Nicholson.                                                   
               We refer to the brief and reply brief and to the answer for            
          a complete exposition of the opposing viewpoints expressed by               
          appellants and the examiner concerning the issues before us on              
          this appeal.                                                                








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007