Appeal No. 2005-0637
Application No. 10/117,958
In summary, with respect to the Examiner’s 35 U.S.C.
§ 102(b) rejection of appealed claims 15-17, we have not
sustained the rejection of claims 15 and 17, but have sustained
the rejection of claim 16. Therefore, the Examiner’s decision
rejecting claims 15-17 is affirmed-in-part.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in
connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR
§ 1.136(a)(1)(iv)(effective September 13, 2004; 69 Fed. Reg.
49960 (August 12, 2004); 1286 Off. Gaz. Pat. and TM Office
21 (September 7, 2004)).
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
ALLEN R. MACDONALD ) APPEALS AND
Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
ROBERT E. NAPPI )
Administrative Patent Judge )
JFR/hh
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007