Appeal No. 2005-0648
Application No. 09/824,980
THE REJECTIONS OF CLAIMS 7, 15 AND 21 OVER THE REFERENCES
DISCUSSED ABOVE AND FURTHER IN VIEW OF MITSUI
On the record of this appeal, these rejections have not been
contested by the appellants. Again see Dance, 160 F.3d at 1340
n.2, 48 USPQ2d at 1636 n.2. As a consequence, we additionally
hereby sustain the examiner’s Section 103 rejections of claim
7 over Kliman, the admitted prior art and Nishiyama in view of
Mitsui and of claims 15 and 21 over Kliman, the admitted prior
art, Nishiyama, McCann and Ackermann in view of Mitsui.
12
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007