The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte Sabine Grimm and Jean-Christophe Simon ____________ Appeal No. 2005-0708 Application No. 09/968,967 ____________ HEARD: April 20, 2005 ____________ Before PAK, WALTZ, and TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges. WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on an appeal from the primary examiner’s final rejection of claims 1, 4, 6-13, 19-24, 26, 27, 29, 30, and 33-48.1 Claims 14-18 are the only other claims pending in this application but stand withdrawn from further consideration by the examiner as directed to a non-elected invention (final Office 1 1Appellants submitted an amendment subsequent to the final rejection, which amendment was entered by the examiner (see the amendment dated Mar. 16, 2004, entered as per the Advisory Action dated Mar. 31, 2004; see also the Brief, page 3, ¶ IV).Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007