Appeal No. 2005-0708 Application No. 09/968,967 For the foregoing reasons and those stated in the Answer, we determine that the examiner has established a prima facie case of obviousness in view of the reference evidence. Based on the totality of the record, including due consideration of appellants’ arguments, we determine that the preponderance of evidence weighs most heavily in favor of obviousness within the meaning of section 103(a). Therefore we affirm the examiner’s rejection of claim 29, and claims 34-36 which stand or fall with claim 29, under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) over Medelnick in view of Simon. 11Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007