Ex Parte Friddle et al - Page 11


                Appeal No. 2005-0731                                                                       Page 11                             
                Application No. 09/974,712                                                                                                     

                Brenner, 383 U.S. at 534-35, 148 USPQ at 695.  This standard has been found to be                                              
                met by pharmaceutical compositions shown to be useful in mouse models and in                                                   
                humans for treating acute myeloblastic leukemia (Jolles, 628 F.2d at 1327-28, 206                                              
                USPQ at 891); by evidence showing successful in vitro testing supplemented by similar                                          
                in vitro and in vivo activities of structurally similar compounds (Cross, 753 F.2d at 1051,                                    
                224 USPQ at 748); and by evidence showing in vivo antitumor activity in mice,                                                  
                combined with a disclosure that the claimed compounds had higher antitumor activity                                            
                than a related compound known to have antitumor activity (Brana, 51 F.3d at 1567, 34                                           
                USPQ2d at 1442).                                                                                                               
                         By contrast, Brenner’s standard has been interpreted to mean that “vague,                                             
                general disclosures or arguments of ‘useful in research’ or ‘useful as building blocks of                                      
                value to the researcher’” would not satisfy § 101.  See Kirk, 376 F.2d at 945, 153 USPQ                                        
                at 55 (interpreting Brenner).  Likewise, a disclosure of a “plastic-like” polypropylene                                        
                capable of being pressed into a flexible film was held to show that the applicant was “at                                      
                best . . . on the way to discovering a practical utility for polypropylene at the time of the                                  
                filing,” but not yet there.  Ziegler, 992 F.2d at 1203, 26 USPQ2d at 1605.                                                     
                         In this case, the examiner found the specification’s disclosure to be inadequate,                                     
                in part because “[n]o comparisons between the sequence of the protein of the present                                           
                invention and any voltage-gated potassium channel protein have been disclosed in the                                           
                specification, nor does the specification disclose that the protein encoded for by the                                         











Page:  Previous  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007