The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte DONALD S. FARQUHAR and KONSTANTINOS I. PAPATHOMAS ____________ Appeal No. 2005-0798 Application No. 10/460,000 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before KIMLIN, JEFFREY T. SMITH and PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative Patent Judges. PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 9, 11-13, 16-19 and 28-38. Claim 9 and 18 are representative of the subject matter on appeal and are set forth below, wherein the text in bold is for emphasis only: 9. A hole fill composition comprising: a fluoropolymer dielectric material; a silica filler material comprised of particles, each particle being substantially spherical or spheroidal and having a size of from about 0.1 micron to about 40 microns; andPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007