Ex Parte Farquhar et al - Page 2

          Appeal No. 2005-0798                                                         
          Application No. 10/460,000                                                   

                    a coupling agent, said filler material having at least             
               a partial coating of said coupling agent thereon.                       
               18. A hole fill composition comprising:                                 
                    a fluoropolymer dielectric material;                               
                    a surfactant;                                                      
                    a silica filler material comprised of                              
               substantially spherical or spheroidal particles, the                    
               particles having a size range distribution of from                      
               about 0.1 micron to about 40 microns; and                               
                    a coupling agent, said filler material having at                   
               least a partial coating of said coupling agent                          
               thereon.                                                                
               On page 4 of the brief, appellants state that all the                   
          claims are grouped together.  We select claim 9 for                          
          consideration in this appeal. 37 CFR § 1.192(c)(7)(2004).                    
               The examiner relies upon the following reference as                     
          evidence of unpatentability:                                                 
          Swei et al. (Swei)       5,506,049            Apr. 09, 1996                  

               Claims 9, 11-13, 16-19, and 28-38 stand rejected under                  
          35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Swei.                             

                                       OPINION                                         
               The examiner’s position regarding the anticipation                      
          rejection is set forth on pages 3-5 of the answer.                           
               The single issue argued in the present appeal is whether                
          Swei anticipates the claimed language of a silica filler                     
          material.  Claim 9 recites a silica filler material “having a                
          size of from about 0.1 micron to about 40 microns”.                          
               The examiner finds that Swei teaches a particle size of                 
          less than 10 microns.  Answer, page 3.   Also, on page 7 of the              
          answer, the examiner states that Swei’s teaching “of more                    
          preferably less than 5 microns”, still overlaps the claimed                  

                                           2                                           


Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007