Appeal No. 2005-0813
Application No. 09/871,492
light” and “other references did not cite motivation for using
InGaAsN” (Answer, page 6).
For the foregoing reasons and those stated in the Brief and
Reply Brief, we determine that the examiner has not established a
prima facie case of obviousness based on the reference evidence.
Therefore we reverse the examiner’s rejection of the claims on
appeal under section 103(a) over Lebby in view of Brillouet.
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007