The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte TAYLOR R. EFLAND, MILTON L. BUSCHBOM and SAMEER PENDHARKAR ____________ Appeal No. 2005-0888 Application No. 10/039,663 ____________ HEARD: October 25, 2005 ____________ Before OWENS, JEFFREY T. SMITH, and PAWLIKOWKSI, Administrative Patent Judges. OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This appeal is from a rejection of claims 1-5, 7-9, 11, 13, 15 and 20-23. Claims 6, 10, 12 and 24-28 have been canceled. Claims 14 and 16-19 stand objected to but allowable if rewritten in independent form. Claims 29-34 have been allowed. THE INVENTION The appellants claim an integrated circuit chip having power distribution lines connected to active components thereunder by metal-filled vias. Claim 1 is illustrative:Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007