Ex Parte Efland et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2005-0888                                                        
          Application No. 10/039,663                                                  

                    1. An integrated circuit chip mounted on a                        
               leadframe, said leadframe having a plurality of segments,              
               comprising:                                                            
                    a network of power distribution lines deposited on                
               the surface of said chip over active components of said                
               circuit;                                                               
                    said lines connected vertically to said components                
               by metal-filled vias, and also to said segments by                     
               conductors; and                                                        
                    the majority of said lines patterned as straight                  
               lines between said vias and said conductors,                           
               respectively, thereby minimizing the distance for power                
               delivery between a selected segment and one or more                    
               corresponding active components, to which said power is                
               to be delivered.                                                       
                                    THE REFERENCES                                    
          Tani                         5,468,993              Nov. 21, 1995           
          Yamasaki et al.              5,973,554              Oct. 26, 1999           
               (Yamasaki)                                                             
          Stanley Wolf and Richard N. Tauber (Wolf), Silicon Processing for           
          the VLSI Era - Volume 1: Process Technology 857-58 (Lattice Press,          
           2nd ed. 2000).                                                             
                                    THE REJECTIONS                                    
               The claims stand rejected as follows: claim 1 under 35 U.S.C.          
          § 102(b) as being anticipated by Yamasaki; claims 2 and 3 under 35          
          U.S.C. § 103 as being obvious over Yamasaki; claims 4, 5, 7, 8, 11,         
          15, 20, 21 and 23 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being obvious over               
          Yamasaki in view of Tani; claim 9 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being            
          obvious over Yamasaki in view of Tani and the admitted prior art;           


                                          2                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007