Ex Parte Charlton - Page 3



          Appeal No. 2005-0943                                                        
          Application No. 09/947,943                                                  

          each and every element of a claimed invention.  RCA Corp. v.                
          Applied Digital Data Sys., Inc., 730 F.2d 1440, 1444, 221 USPQ              
          385, 388 (Fed. Cir. 1984).                                                  
               Sarosiek discloses an esophageal catheter 10 comprising an             
          elongate outer housing 11, two balloons 30 and 32 disposed in               
          spaced apart relation on the outer surface of the housing, a                
          plurality of ports extending from the interior to the exterior of           
          the housing and six tubular channels located within the housing.            
          Each channel communicates with at least one port:                           
               the balloon channels 22 and 24 communicate with the                    
               balloons 32 and 30, through ports not illustrated.                     
               Channel 12 communicates with ports 18 and 19.  The                     
               aspirating channel 14 communicates with port 20 above                  
               the upper balloon.  Air vent channel 28 communicates                   
               with port 21 just below the upper balloon 32.  Gastric                 
               aspirating channel 15 communicates with the plurality                  
               of ports 16, located at the tip or distal end 34 of the                
               catheter [column 3, lines 7 through 15].                               
               As framed and argued by the appellant, the dispositive issue           
          in the appeal is whether Sarosiek meets the limitation in claim 1           
          requiring the recited catheter to comprise “a single inflatable             
          balloon.”  According to the appellant, “Sarosiek et al. discloses           
          an esophageal perfusion catheter with at least two balloons . . .           
          [and] does NOT disclose, teach or suggest an esophageal perfusion           
          catheter with a single balloon (brief, pages 4 and 5).                      

                                          3                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007