Appeal No. 2005-0952
Application No. 09/908,282
As noted on page 1 of appellant’s specification, the present
invention relates to a form for receiving printed information
relating to recorded documents and, more specifically, to a form
having a plurality of detachable parts capable of having
information, such as, for example, user data, government data,
and the like, printed thereon by a printer. Independent claim
1 is representative of the subject matter on appeal, and a copy
of that claim can be found in the Appendix to appellant’s brief.
The prior art references of record relied upon by the
examiner as evidence of obviousness under 35 U.S.C. § 103 are:
Korondi, Jr. (Korondi) 5,702,127 Dec. 30, 1997
Amon et al. (Amon) 5,807,625 Sep. 15, 1998
Claims 1 through 9 and 12 through 17 stand rejected under
35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Korondi.
Claims 10 and 11 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
being unpatentable over Korondi in view of Amon.
2
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007