Ex Parte Petkovsek - Page 4



            Appeal No. 2005-0952                                                                         
            Application No. 09/908,282                                                                   

            layer (20) defined by a plane having front and back sides wherein                            
            the back side has a perimeter defined by exterior edges and                                  
            further wherein the front side has a first label (32) and a                                  
            second label (34); an adhesive layer (24) applied on the back                                
            side of the first layer (col. 4, lines 8-10 and col. 5, lines                                
            18-24) wherein the adhesive layer covers the back side between                               
            the exterior edges defining the perimeter of the back side of the                            
            first layer; a backing layer (12) attached to the first layer by                             
            the adhesive layer, wherein the first and second labels (32, 34)                             
            on the front side of layer (20) receive printed information, and                             
            further wherein the adhesive layer separates from the backing                                
            layer and is attachable to a surface.  Thus, the examiner is of                              
            the view that the physical structure of the label form in Korondi                            
            is the same as that of the form set forth in claim 1 on appeal.                              

            Concerning the recitation in claim 1 that the information to                                 
            be printed on the form is “electronically imaged information                                 
            accessed over a global computer network wherein the                                          
            electronically imaged information is necessary to comply with                                
            requirements for recording of the document,” the examiner                                    
            contends that such recitation does not structurally limit the                                
            claim, because the patentability of a product does not depend on                             
                                                   4                                                     




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007