The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte DIANA NGUYEN-THIEN-NHON, MYRON HOWANEC JR.,
RALPH KAFESJIAN, DELOS M. COSGROVE, ROBERT STOBIE and HUNG LY LAM
____________
Appeal No. 2005-0957
Application No. 09/745,386
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before FRANKFORT, NASE, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.
FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1-4, 24
and 25. Claims 5-7 and 26, the only other claims remaining have been withdrawn from
further prosecution as being drawn to a non-elected species. Claims 8-23 were
cancelled by an amendment filed April 12, 2000.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007