Ex Parte Rozario et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2005-0973                                                        
          Application No. 09/740,669                                                  

               1. An apparatus for scheduling a Direct Memory Access (DMA)            
          device having multiple channels, comprising:                                
               a shift structure having a plurality of entries                        
          corresponding to the multiple channels to be scheduled, wherein             
          each entry in said shift structure includes a plurality of                  
          fields, and wherein each entry includes a weight that is                    
          determined based on said plurality of fields; and                           
               a comparison-logic circuit configured to sort said entries             
          based on their respective weights.                                          
               10. A method of scheduling multiple channels on a Direct               
          Memory Access (DMA) device, comprising:                                     
               writing a plurality of entries in a shift structure, wherein           
          each entry is associated with a channel on the DMA, and wherein             
          each entry includes a plurality of fields;                                  
               assigning weights to said entries based on said plurality of           
          fields;                                                                     
               sorting said entries based on said weights, wherein an entry           
          having the highest weight is sorted to the head of said shift               
          structure; and                                                              
               reading said entry from the head of said shift structure to            
          service the channel associated with said entry.                             
               The examiner relies on the following references:                       
          Lee et al. (Lee)       5,504,919             Apr.  2, 1996                  
          Bass et al. (Bass)       6,052,375           Apr. 18, 2000                  
               Claims 5-8, and 14-18 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112,            
          first paragraph, as relying on a non-enabling disclosure.                   
               Claim 9 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 101 as being                 
          inoperative and lacking utility.                                            
                                          2                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007