Appeal No. 2005-1002 Application No. 09/991,247 § 103(a) rejection of claim 1 as being unpatentable over Michelson ‘973 in view of Boyce ‘187. As claims 2, 3 and 5 through 88 stand or fall with claim 1, we also shall sustain the standing 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) rejection of claims 2, 3, 5 through 16, 18, 23 through 49, 55 through 78 and 84 through 88 as being unpatentable over Michelson ‘973 in view of Boyce ‘187, the standing 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) rejection of claims 17, 50 and 79 as being unpatentable over Michelson ‘973 in view of Boyce ‘187 and Boyce ‘939, and the standing 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) rejection of claims 19 through 22, 51 through 54 and 80 through 83 as being unpatentable over Michelson ‘973 in view of Boyce ‘187 and Michelson ‘437. SUMMARY The decision of the examiner to reject claims 1 through 3 and 5 through 88 is affirmed. No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a). 7Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007