Appeal No. 2005-1035 Application No. 09/800,153 manifold 18 connected downstream of the port and a plurality of elongate tubing members 30, 34 connected to the outlets of the distribution manifold, each tubing member extending through at least one wall of the building and having fluid discharge openings 38 spaced along the tubing members. This appealed subject matter is adequately illustrated by independent claim 1 which reads as follows: 1. A system for distributing pesticide into interior walls of a building comprising a port mounted in an exterior wall of the building, said port being adapted to receive a discharge portion of a fluid injection device wherein the injection device includes an inert gas inlet, a pesticide inlet, and valve means for selectively providing inert gas and pesticide to the discharge portion, a distribution manifold connected downstream of the port having an inlet portion and a plurality of outlets, a plurality of elongate tubing members connected to the outlets, each tubing member extending through at last [sic, least] one wall of the building and having fluid discharge openings spaced along said tubing members. The references set forth below are relied upon by the Examiner as evidence of obviousness: Hill 2,246,731 June 24, 1941 Wing 2,862,765 Dec. 2, 1958 Jackson 4,800,672 Jan. 31, 1989 Konieczynski 4,917,296 Apr. 17, 1990 Cann 5,310,114 May 10, 1994 Claims 1-5, 7 and 8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Jackson in view of Wing, and the remaining appealed claims are correspondingly rejected over these references in various combinations with the other references listed above. 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007