Ex Parte Inoue - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2005-1065                                                        
          Application No. 10/095,053                                                  

          appellant’s specification (p. 2, l. 24-p. 3, l. 22), the claimed            
          method provides a gate oxide film of uniform thickness where the            
          thickness directly above an oxidation preventive film at the top            
          edge of a trench structure is of the same order as the thickness            
          of the gate oxide film at other locations along the surface of              
          the semiconductor substrate.  This is said to solve a so-called             
          “thinning” problem experienced in the prior art.1                           
               Appellant’s brief (page 4) stipulates that the appealed                
          claims stand or fall together with independent claim 1.                     
          Accordingly, we shall limit our consideration to claim 1 which              
          reads as follows:                                                           
                    1.  A method of manufacturing a semiconductor device              
               comprising:                                                            
                    a step of forming a trench at a main surface of a                 
               semiconductor substrate;                                               
                    the step of forming an oxidation preventive film along            
               an inner wall of said trench;                                          
                    the step of forming a filling layer so as to fill said            
               trench; and                                                            



               1We note in passing that appellant’s brief and reply brief             
          erroneously state that it is the oxidation preventive film,                 
          rather that the gate oxide film, which is subject to thinning.              
          This is clearly not the case, as thoroughly discussed in                    
          appellant’s specification.                                                  
                                          2                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007