Ex Parte Liprie - Page 1






                                       The opinion in support of the decision being entered                                          
                                  today was not written for publication and is not binding                                           
                                  precedent of the Board.                                                                            


                                  UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                          
                                                        _______________                                                              
                                        BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                           
                                                     AND INTERFERENCES                                                               
                                                        _______________                                                              
                                                  Ex parte SAMUEL F. LIPRIE                                                          
                                                         ______________                                                              
                                                      Appeal No. 2005-1078                                                           
                                                      Application 09/681,303                                                         
                                                        _______________                                                              
                                                            ON BRIEF                                                                 
                                                        _______________                                                              
               Before WARREN, OWENS and DELMENDO, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                      
               WARREN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                  
                                                        Decision on Appeal                                                           
                       This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the decision of the examiner finally                             
               rejecting claims 1 through 31, all of the claims in the application,                                                  
                       Claims 1, 4 and 7 illustrate appellant’s invention of a flexible source wire for radiation                    
               treatment having a housing tube constructed from a material exhibiting little or no memory                            
               retention when bent, and are representative of the claims on appeal:1                                                 
               1.  A flexible source wire for radiation treatment of diseases within a body comprising:                              
               a flexible, hollow, elongated housing tube having a distal end and a proximal end, said housing                       
               tube constructed from a material exhibiting little or no memory retention when bent;                                  
               a flexible backbone wire having a proximal end, said proximal end of said wire being disposed in                      
               said housing tube; and                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                    
               1  We have considered the claims as presented in the supplemental examiner’s answer mailed                            
               November 22, 2004, pursuant to the remand by the Board entered April 19, 2004.                                        

                                                            - 1 -                                                                    



Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007