The opinion in support of the decision being
entered today was not written for publication
and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte TIMOTHY H. DAILY, JIRI PAZDIREK
and ROBERT G. BUDZYN
____________
Appeal No. 2005-1126
Application No. 09/846,141
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before FRANKFORT, MCQUADE and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
MCQUADE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Timothy H. Daily et al. originally took this appeal from the
final rejection of claims 2 through 18 and 22 through 27. As the
appellants have since canceled claims 22 through 27, the appeal
now involves claims 2 through 18, all of the claims currently
pending in the application.
THE INVENTION
The invention relates to “stabilizer bars, such as the
stabilizer bars used in automotive suspensions” (specification,
page 1). Representative claims 2 and 5 read as follows:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007