Ex Parte Daily et al - Page 7



          Appeal No. 2005-1126                                                        
          Application No. 09/846,141                                                  
               Finally, because the reasoning underlying our action in                
          sustaining the rejection of claims 5 through 7, 14/5, 15/5 and              
          16/5 differs significantly from that advanced by the examiner in            
          support of the rejection, we hereby designate our action in this            
          regard as a new ground of rejection under 37 CFR § 41.50(b) to              
          afford the appellants a fair opportunity to react thereto.                  

                                      SUMMARY                                         
               The decision of the examiner to reject claims 2 through 18             
          is affirmed with respect to claims 5 through 7, 14/5, 15/5 and              
          16/5, and reversed with respect to claims 2 through 4, 8 through            
          13, 14/2, 15/2, 16/2, 17 and 18.  In addition, the affirmance of            
          the rejection of claims 5 through 7, 14/5, 15/5 and 16/5                    
          constitutes a new ground of rejection under 37 CFR § 41.50(b).              
               This decision contains a new ground of rejection pursuant to           
          37 CFR § 41.50(b) (effective September 13, 2004, 69 Fed. Reg.               
          49960 (August 12, 2004), 1286 Off. Gaz. Pat. Office 21 (September           
          7, 2004)).  37 CFR § 41.50(b) provides "[a] new ground of                   
          rejection pursuant to this paragraph shall not be considered                
          final for judicial review."                                                 



                                          7                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007