Appeal No. 2005-1132 Application No. 09/738,294 claim 23 to determine the status (presence and availability) of network components in Tang. As noted above, we find that it is unnecessary to rely on Klein in support of the examiner’s rejection. In summary, we have sustained each of the examiner’s rejections of the claims on appeal. Therefore, the decision of the examiner rejecting claims 1-23 is affirmed. No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a)(1)(iv). AFFIRMED JERRY SMITH ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT ) JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO ) APPEALS AND Administrative Patent Judge ) ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) JOSEPH L. DIXON ) Administrative Patent Judge ) JS/dpv -11-Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007