The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte DAVID A. BEAUCHAINE, TIMOTHY L. BROWN, SERGEI V. KOVESHNIKOV and ROMONY SAN ____________ Appeal No. 2005-1139 Application No. 10/410,792 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before SMITH, GROSS, and BARRY, Administrative Patent Judges. JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s rejection of claims 37-40, which constitute all the claims pending in the application. The disclosed invention pertains to a double-side mirror- polished semiconductor wafer containing extrinsic gettering sites on a back surface of the wafer. The claims on appeal are directed to the wafer as made by a specific claimed process. Representative claim 37 is reproduced as follows:Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007