Ex Parte Beauchaine et al - Page 1



              The opinion in support of the decision being entered today              
                      was not written for publication and is not                      
                            binding precedent of the Board.                           
                                                            Paper No.                 
                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                                     ____________                                     
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                          
                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                  
                                     ____________                                     
                    Ex parte DAVID A. BEAUCHAINE, TIMOTHY L. BROWN,                   
                         SERGEI V. KOVESHNIKOV and ROMONY SAN                         
                                     ____________                                     
                                 Appeal No. 2005-1139                                 
                              Application No. 10/410,792                              
                                     ____________                                     
                                       ON BRIEF                                       
                                     ____________                                     
          Before SMITH, GROSS, and BARRY, Administrative Patent Judges.               
          JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.                                   

                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                  
               This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from            
          the examiner’s rejection of claims 37-40, which constitute all              
          the claims pending in the application.                                      
               The disclosed invention pertains to a double-side mirror-              
          polished semiconductor wafer containing extrinsic gettering sites           
          on a back surface of the wafer.  The claims on appeal are                   
          directed to the wafer as made by a specific claimed process.                
               Representative claim 37 is reproduced as follows:                      






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007