The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte OMAR S. KHALIL, SHU-JEN YEH, STANISLAW KANTOR, CHARLES F. HANNA and ERIC B. SHAIN ____________ Appeal No. 2005-1147 Application No. 09/834,440 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before SMITH, LEVY, and BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judges. JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s rejection of claims 1-18, which constitute all the claims in the application. The disclosed invention pertains to a method and apparatus for the determination of a disease state in a human subject. Representative claim 1 is reproduced as follows: 1. A method for the determination of a disease state in a human subject, said method comprising the steps of:Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007