Appeal No. 2005-1147 8 Application No. 09/834,440 found to be unpersuasive for reasons discussed above and as explained by the examiner. In summary, we have sustained each of the examiner’s rejections of the claims on appeal. Therefore, the decision of the examiner rejecting claims 1-18 is affirmed. No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a)(1)(iv). AFFIRMED JERRY SMITH ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT STUART S. LEVY ) APPEALS Administrative Patent Judge ) AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP ) Administrative Patent Judge )Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007