Ex Parte Basu et al - Page 10




              Appeal No. 2005-1152                                                                                       
              Application No. 10/202,616                                                                                 
              acids, carboxy, thiol, amino and other reactive side-chain functionalities to minimize                     
              undesired side reactions (col. 31). Zuckermann also discloses that a pharmaceutical                        
              composition can contain a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier such as proteins,                            
              polymeric amino aids, amino acid copolymers etc. Pharmaceutically acceptable salts                         
              can be used therein, for example, mineral acid salts, phosphates, sulfates, and salts of                   
              organic acids (col. 32, Iines 33-63).                                                                      
                     The examiner concludes (Paper No. 6, page 6):                                                       
                     [i]t would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art at the                        
                     time the invention was made to have modified the formulations and                                   
                     methods of the combined references by adding the additives such as                                  
              carboxylic acids, salts and amino acids as taught by Zuckermann because of disclosed                       
              benefits of such additives in pharmaceutical formulations and reduction of undesired                       
              side reactions and improving                                                                               
                     stability of the product.                                                                           
                     We have found no prima facie case of obviousness over Hanes in                                      
              view of Szoka.  We do not find the disclosure of Zuckermann overcomes the                                  
              deficiencies of the primary combination of Hanes and Szoka. The rejection of claims 1-                     
              24, 32-40, 43 and 45-57 under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) for obviousness over Hanes in view of                       
              Szoka and the rejection of claims 25-31, 41-42 and 44 under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) for                           
              obviousness over Hanes in view of Szoka in further view of Zuckerman is reversed.                          

                                                    CONCLUSION                                                           
                     The rejection of claims 1-8, 24, 27-28, 32, 36-40 and 43-44 under 35 U.S.C.                         
              102(b) as anticipated by Unger. The rejection of claims 1-24, 32-40, 43 and 45-57 under                    
              35 U.S.C. 103(a) for obviousness over Hanes in view of Szoka is reversed.  The                             

                                                           10                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007