Ex Parte ZHAO et al - Page 2




             Appeal No. 2005-1171                                                                              
             Application No. 09/469,485                                                                        
                   Claim 8 is representative of the subject matter on appeal and reads as follows:             
                   8.   A method of increasing the antigenicity of recombinant hepatitis B surface             
                   antigen (rHBsAg) comprising:                                                                
                          a)  providing soluble sterile filtered rHBsAg purified from a cell culture,          
                          b)  adding a redox buffer to the rHBsAg,                                             
                          c)  adjusting the temperature to about 34° C to about 38° C,                         
                          d)  incubating the rHBsAg at about 34° C to about 38° C for about 40 to              
                          about 240 hours, wherein the antigenicity of the rHBsAg produced after               
                          step d is greater than the antigenicity of the rHBsAg provided in step a.            

                   The references relied upon by the examiner are:                                             
             Even-Chen                       5,242,812                 Sep. 7, 1993                            
             Builder et al. (Builder)        4,620,948                 Nov. 4, 1986                            
             Petre et al. (Petre)            WO 93/24148               Dec. 9, 1993                            
             Valenzuela et al. (Valenzuela), “Nucleotide sequence of the gene coding for the major             
             protein of hepatitis B virus surface antigen,” Nature, vol. 280, pp. 815-819, (1979).             


                   The claims stand rejected as follows:                                                       
             I.   Claims 8-16 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over               
             Builder and Valenzuela.                                                                           
             II.  Claims 17, 19 and 20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable           
             over Builder and Valenzuela as applied to claims 8-16 above, and further in view of               
             Petre.                                                                                            




                                                      2                                                        





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007