Appeal No. 2005-1207 Application No. 10/126,342 Page 4 Concerning this matter, Brooker teaches that the meltblown fibers employed are tacky subsequent to extrusion through a die and prior to consolidation. While the fibers are in a tacky state, Brooker teaches that the particles are incorporated in the meltblown fiber stream in a manner such that the particles adhere to the surfaces of the tacky fibers thereby avoiding subsequent dusting problems with the product during use. See the abstract, column 2, lines 20-44 and column 3, lines 4-19 of Brooker. Dusting is the same or similar problem allegedly addressed by appellants’ claimed invention. See page 2, lines 15-17 of appellants’ specification. Moreover, Brooker teaches that the particles employed can be fed via a feed hopper using an air stream to convey the particles or powder into the stream of meltblown fibers so as to hold the particles to the fibers within the formed web by more than physical entrapment of particles among the fibers. See column 6, lines 3 through 53 of Brooker. Given that disclosure of Brooker, we agree with the examiner that it is reasonable to conclude that the particles of Brooker would at least slightly penetrate (pass into or through, or reach) the tacky surface (outer face or boundary) of the required by representative claim 13. Thus, we need not address McFarland with regard to representative claim 10.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007