Appeal No. 2005-1207 Application No. 10/126,342 Page 9 CONCLUSION The decision of the examiner to reject claims 10-23 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Brooker in view of McFarland is affirmed. No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a)(iv)(effective Sept. 13, 2003; 69 Fed. Reg. 49960 (Aug. 12, 2004); 1286 Off. Gaz. Pat. Office 21 (Sept. 7, 2004)). AFFIRMED THOMAS A. WALTZ ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT PETER F. KRATZ ) APPEALS Administrative Patent Judge ) AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) BEVERLY A. PAWLIKOWSKI ) Administrative Patent Judge ) PFK/sldPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007