Ex Parte Williams et al - Page 2




             Appeal No. 2005-1264                                                               Page 2                
             Application No. 09/682,594                                                                               


                                                  BACKGROUND                                                          
                    The appellants’ invention relates to a re-configurable roof rack system for a                     
             vehicle including at least one storage surface having a first position generally coincident              
             with the roof of the vehicle and a second position generally coincident with a side of the               
             vehicle.  A copy of the claims under appeal is set forth in the appendix to the appellants’              
             brief.                                                                                                   
                                               The Applied Prior Art                                                  
                    The examiner relied upon the following prior art references of record in rejecting                
             the appealed claims:                                                                                     
             Aftanas et al. (Aftanas)                  6,338,427                   Jan. 15, 2002                      
                                                                            (filed Mar. 17, 2000)                     
             Parkins                                   1,043,227                   Sep. 21, 1966                      
                    (British patent specification)                                                                    
                                                  The Rejections                                                      
                    The following rejections are before us for review.                                                
                    Claims 35 and 37-39 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, as                     
             containing subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as                  
             to reasonably convey to one skilled in the art that appellants, at the time the application              
             was filed, had possession of the claimed invention.                                                      
                    Claims 35 and 37 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as being anticipated                     
             by Aftanas.                                                                                              








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007