Appeal No. 2005-1278 Page 3
Application No. 10/145,226
Claims 12 to 31 stand provisionally rejected under the judicially created doctrine
of double patenting over claims 1-19 of copending U.S. Patent Application No.
10/163,004 to Overholt et al.
Claims 16, 17, 26 and 27 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second
paragraph.
Claims 12 to 18, 26 and 27 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being
clearly anticipated by Jacques '342.
Claims 12 to 31 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as being clearly
anticipated by Overholt '054.
Claims 12 to 14, 25, 26, 28, 29 and 31 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e)
as being anticipated by Jacques '420.
Claims 15, 27 and 30 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over Jacques '420 in view of Jacques '342.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007