Appeal No. 2005-1348 Application No. 09/534,466 As shown in Fig. 2 of Jurkewitz..., when the printing press is run up to operating speed from S0 to S1, the tension P in the web remains at a low steady P1 and when the printing press speed goes beyond S1, (mode change from white web mode to a printing mode) the tension P in the web starts to increase as indicated by arrow 38a. When the printing press speed decreases from S2 to S0 (from printing mode to white web mode) as indicated by leftward arrow 38b, the tension P in the web starts to decrease as indicated by a vertical down arrow 38b upon reaching speed S0. Since the web moving under a non-printing condition is defined as a white web by the present application, the web speed S0 in the Jurkewitz patent during which the printing press is stopped or running at a very slight web speed while no printing is taking place qualifies as a white web mode. Thus, it is clear that the examiner is relying on Jurkewitz’s low or no speed value as being equivalent to the claimed white web mode. We refer to the instant specification for a definition of “white web.” At page 1, we find a description of the web press running in a print and a non-print mode (lines 17-23), and a definition at lines 23-24: “The web in this non-printing condition is known as a white web, since ink is not applied to the web.” Accordingly, a white web condition has little, if anything, to do with web speed. Rather, a white web condition is determined when there is no ink applied to the web. -4-Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007