Ex Parte Cozar et al - Page 3



          Appeal No. 2005-1354                                                        
          Application No. 09/940,481                                                  

               The examiner relies upon the following references as                   
          evidence of obviousness:                                                    
          Ishikawa et al. (Ishikawa)      4,832,908           May  23, 1989           
          Kato et al. (Kato)              5,164,021           Nov. 17, 1992           
          Inoue et al. (Inoue)            5,234,512           Aug. 10, 1993           
          Fukuda et al. (Fukuda)          5,236,522           Aug. 17, 1993           
               Appellants' claimed invention is directed to an alloy of               
          iron, nickel and cobalt that is used to form shadow masks.                  
          According to appellants, they "have discovered that local doming            
          which may occur in shadow masks exposed to thermal stress can be            
          reduced if the alloy from which the shadow mask is made adheres             
          to the compositional and/or physical property requirements of the           
          claimed invention" (page 4 of principal brief, third paragraph).            
               This application is a continuation of U.S. Application                 
          No. 08/641,233 filed on April 30, 1996, now abandoned.  The                 
          parent case was before this Board and, in a decision dated                  
          June 29, 2001, the Board affirmed the examiner's rejection under            
          35 U.S.C. § 103 over the same claims 1-8 presently before us over           
          the same prior art references.                                              
               Appealed claims 1-18 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112,             
          first paragraph, enablement requirement.  Claims 1-18 stand                 
          rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Inoue             
          in view of Fukuda, Ishikawa and Kato.  Claims 1-8 are also                  
          rejected under res judicata based on the prior Board decision.              
                                         -3-                                          



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007