Ex Parte Nakamura et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2005-1458                                                        
          Application No. 09/732,799                                 Page 2           




               17.  A single crystal diamond p-type semiconductor having a            
          thermal conductivity of from about 26-31 W/cmoK and consisting of           
          at least 99.5% isotopically pure 12C or 13C and boron in an amount          
          not exceeding 100 ppm.                                                      
               18.  A method of manufacturing a single crystal diamond p-             
          type semiconductor having a thermal conductivity of from about              
          26-31 W/cmoK and a boron content not exceeding 100 ppm comprising           
          the steps of:                                                               
               providing a carbonaceous material containing isotopically              
          purified 12C or 13C;                                                        
               providing a flux containing a nitrogen getter;                         
               adding boron into the carbonaceous material or/and the flux,           
          or around the carbonaceous material and the flux; and                       
               diffusing the carbonaceous material into the flux under a              
          high temperature and pressure to form a boron-doped single                  
          crystal diamond p-type semicconductor on a seed crystal diamond.            
               The prior art references of record1 relied upon by the                 
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                              
          Tsuji et al. (Tsuji)          5,328,548           Jul. 12, 1994             
          Anthony et al. (Anthony)      5,451,430           Sep. 19, 1995             



               1 The examiner also refers to another reference at page 3 of           
          the answer as representing prior art of record.  However, the               
          examiner does not rely on that other reference in rejecting the             
          claims.  Thus, we do not consider that other listed reference in            
          assessing the propriety of the rejection before us.                         





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007