Ex Parte Wenninger et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2005-1472                                       Page 2           
          Application No. 09/750,984                                                  
                                     BACKGROUND                                       
               Appellants' invention relates to an adhesive tape and a                
          method of using such a tape for detecting unauthorized broaching            
          of a package.  The tape includes an oriented, co-extruded, multi-           
          layer polypropylene film composite backing wherein one side of              
          the film is coated with an adhesive layer that has a bond                   
          strength greater than the cleavage strength of the composite                
          backing.   Exemplary claims 1 and 10 are reproduced below.                  
                    1. An adhesive tape comprising a composite backing                
               based on an oriented, coextruded, at least two-layer                   
               polypropylene film whose one side is provided with an                  
               adhesive layer wherein the cleavage strength of the                    
               composite backing is less then the bond strength of the                
               adhesive.                                                              
                    10. A method for detecting unauthorized broaching                 
               of a package, which comprises sealing said package with                
               the adhesive tape of Claim 1, wherein when the adhesive                
               tape is removed from the surface of a package the                      
               adhesive tape is irreversibly destroyed and indicates                  
               an attempted broaching by tearing or splitting in the                  
               thickness direction.                                                   
               In addition to alleged admitted prior art, the prior art               
          references of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the           
          appealed claims are:                                                        










Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007