Appeal No. 2005-1472 Page 8 Application No. 09/750,984 CONCLUSION The decision of the examiner to reject claims 1-9 and 11-13 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over alleged admissions at page 3, lines 10-17 and page 6, lines 9-12 of appellants’ specification with or without the additional teachings of Allegre and to reject claim 10 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Freedman taken in view of the alleged admissions at page 3, lines 10-17 of appellants’ specification is reversed. REVERSED BRADLEY R. GARRIS ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT PETER F. KRATZ ) APPEALS Administrative Patent Judge ) AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) BEVERLY A. PAWLIKOWSKI ) Administrative Patent Judge ) PFK/sldPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007