The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte WALTER GOERENZ, ULLRICH BILLERT, DIETER LINNHOFER, WALTER NIEVELSTEIN, ROLF VAN DER MEULEN, and VOLKMAR OFFERMANN ____________ Appeal No. 2005-1577 Application No. 09/851,159 ____________ HEARD: September 14, 2005 ____________ Before KIMLIN, KRATZ and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges. KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's refusal to allow claims 1-3, 5-7 and 9-22. Claim 4, which is the only other claim pending in this application, stands withdrawn from further consideration by the examiner as drawn to a non-elected invention. BACKGROUND Appellants' invention relates to a laminated glazing unit and method of preparing same. An understanding of the inventionPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007