Ex Parte Markusch et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2005-1611                                                        
          Application No. 09/808,812                                                  

                    1.     A two-ply polyurethane geotextile composite in             
               which a dimensionally stable geotextile is bonded to a                 
               pliable geotextile with a solidifiable liquid polyurethane             
               composition which is a reaction product of a mixture                   
               comprising:                                                            
                    a)     a liquid polyisocyanate having an isocyanate               
               content of at least 10% by weight,                                     
                    b)     an isocyanate reactive component comprising a              
               polyether polyol having from 2 to 6 hydroxyl groups and a              
               number average molecular weight of from 250 to 8,000 and 0             
               to 10% by weight, based on total weight of b), of a low                
               molecular weight diol or triol having an equivalent weight             
               of from 31 to 99,                                                      
                    c)     a urethane catalyst, and                                   
               optionally,                                                            
                    d)     a filler.                                                  
               The references set forth below are relied upon by the                  
          examiner in the Section 102 and Section 103 rejections before us:           
          Lou et al. (Lou)              4,582,750             Apr. 15, 1986           
          Payne                         4,872,784             Oct. 10, 1989           
          Gasper et al. (Gasper)        4,968,542             Nov.  6, 1990           
          Adam et al. (Adam)            5,421,677             Jun.  6, 1995           
          Sinclair                      5,464,919             Nov.  7, 1995           
          Kausch et al. (Kausch)        5,674,565             Oct.  7, 1997           
               Claims 1, 2, 5 and 6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b)             
          as being anticipated by Gasper as evidenced by Sinclair and                 
          Kausch.                                                                     
               Claims 1-8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being              
          unpatentable over Payne in view of Adam or alternatively as being           

                                          2                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007