Ex Parte Hinds et al - Page 2


           Appeal No. 2005-1635                                                                      
           Application No. 09/782,036                                                                
                                    APPEALED SUBJECT MATTER                                          
                 The subject matter on appeal relates to a process for                               
           making a floor covering.  See the specification, page 1.  The                             
           process involves scattering thermoplastic powder onto a first                             
           substrate, such as a conveyer belt, to form a first coating                               
           layer; applying a second substrate, such as a fiber matt, over                            
           the first coating layer; scattering thermoplastic powder onto                             
           the second substrate to form a second coating layer; heating the                          
           coating layers to fuse them onto the second substrate; smoothing                          
           the coating layers with nipping rollers; and finally cooling the                          
           coating layers to form a laminated floor covering.  See the                               
           specification, page 9.  Further details of this appealed subject                          
           mater are recited in claims 1, 8, 13 and 32, which are                                    
           reproduced below1:                                                                        
                 1.   A method for manufacturing a floor covering comprising                         
           the steps of:                                                                             
                                                                                                    
                 1 On page 4 of the Brief, the appellants have grouped the                           
           claims on appeal as follows:                                                              
                  i. Claims 1 through 5, 10 through 23 and 25 through 31;                            
                 ii. Claim 8;                                                                        
                iii. Claims 13 through 17, 19 and 20; and                                            
                 iv. Claim 32.                                                                       
           Therefore, for purpose of this appeal, we selected claims 1, 32,                          
           8 and 13 as representative of all of the claims on appeal and                             
           determine the propriety of the examiner’s rejections below based                          
           on these claims alone consistent with 37 CFR § 1.192(c)(7)(2003)                          
           and 37 CFR § 41.37(c)(i)(vii)(2004).                                                      
                                                 2                                                   


Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007