Appeal No. 2005-1705
Application 09/455,956
terminal, and 2) that the sports server transmits the sports data
from the sport server to an output device which has requested the
sports data, and wherein the sports data is adapted to a desired
format for the output device by a dedicated filter. With respect
to the first point, appellant argues that since all parts of the
Lobb and Moriarty systems are designed to work with each other,
there is no need for the central computer to determine the type
of input device and the display characteristics thereof.
Appellant argues that Eiba also fails to teach or suggest
anything related to the determination of the type of the device
in communication with the server. With respect to the second
point, appellant argues that any input and output devices in Lobb
and Moriarty are designed as part of the overall system, thus
obviating the requirement for adapting the data. Appellant also
argues that Eiba fails to teach or suggest this limitation.
Finally, appellant argues that there is no motivation for
combining the teachings of Eiba with those of Lobb and Moriarty
[brief, pages 6-10].
-7-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007