Appeal No. 2005-1826
Application No. 10/210,046
panel members, each of said panel members constructed with a
container forming section, a reinforcing section adapted to
folded over and secured to said container forming section, said
reinforcing section being defined and separated from said
container forming section by score lines and a bottom section
defined and separated from said container forming section by
score lines, said bottom section being folded on scoring which
separates it from said container forming section to form at least
a portion of a bottom of the container, said bottom section
overlapping a bottom section of an adjacent panel, each side
panel member, front panel member and rear panel member comprising
two overlapping walls formed by said container forming section
and said reinforcing section which are secured together, at least
one of said panel members defining a cutout allowing entry into
an interior of said container and a plurality of corner support
members defined by said panel members, each said corner support
member extending between adjacent panels to provide stacking
support for containers placed thereon and being seated in
recesses cut into said reinforcing section.
THE PRIOR ART
The references relied on by the examiner to support the
final rejection are:
Hamilton Re. 25,050 Oct. 10, 1961
Kanter et al. (Kanter) 6,158,653 Dec. 12, 2000
THE REJECTIONS
Claims 1-5, 7, 9 and 13-20 stand rejected under
35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, as failing to particularly
point out and distinctly claim the subject matter the appellant
regards as the invention.
Claims 1-3, 5 and 7 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b)
as being anticipated by Kanter.
2
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007